A student recently gave me a copy of Temple Grandin's book, "Animals in Translation". Grandin has autism, and has helped many animals, which she seems to understand in a different way due to her unique perspective.
Grandin, according to the first chapter as I read, believes that cattle especially are visual thinkers. Because she also considers herself a visual thinker, she has been able to help cattle ranchers and slaughter house managers to make life (and death) events for cattle easier and more humane for the animals.
But what about dogs? I haven't read very far into her book, and perhaps Grandin says more about the domestic dog in her writings, but I'm speculating now anyhow. How do dogs view the world? Are they visual too?
Well, because I am a dog trainer I am expected to know a few things about how dogs think. I do know that some dogs use their eyes more readily than others. This is why we tend to classify some dogs as "sighthounds" and others "scenthounds", and I believe I have both in my own household. They do think about things in a different way.
Cesar Millan uses the developmental pathway phrase, "nose, eyes, ears". Puppies are born with eyes and ears closed, but with their nose ready to find their mother for comfort and safety and her nipples for nourishment. Later the eyes and the ears open. Millan contends that they use their senses with that same priority throughout life: nose, eyes, then ears-- scent, sight, and sound.
Recently, I visited my chiropracter as I do at least once every week, and have been for several years. I have a special relationship with his dog, as she attended my puppy classes and I helped her through daycare and some private training, as well as visiting with her in his office almost every week for most of her life.
I should add that sometime last year, I realized that she recognized me upon my arrival to his office by sound. I had a certain sunglasses case, and also a set of keys, that I would snap shut or fiddle with as I sat in the waiting area. She would often ignore other patients but come running when she heard either of those sounds. She had come to associate them with my arrival.
But this most recent event surprised me. I went to sit down at the end of the hallway, and saw her at the other end. She moseyed on up the hallway very casually, all the way to me. Then, as soon as her nose approached my hand, she leaped in surprise and joy, licking and mouthing gently as she usually does.
I was surprised because I expected her to recognize me by sight, but she didn't appear to do so until her nose caught my familiar scent. Nose, eyes, ears?
What does this mean to dog training?
Well, I know that when puppies are very young, it is important to start teaching them to come to their name when you are quite close to them, as their eyesight doesn't develop as fast as you may think.
With adult dogs, we depend on them to recognize our body language, especially hand signals, to respond to obedience training cues. We also use verbal commands to help them learn, but I have learned that dogs seem to be more attunded to body language than verbal cues. For the blind or deaf dog, training is still quite possible because the other senses can be used to teach and train. And of course, the working scent dog has brought many lost children home, many criminals to justice, prevented many crimes, and accomplished much, much more than we could do alone.
Trainers commonly use treats to lure dogs and add extra scent to articles for retrieving and other purposes. But we must be careful not to underestimate the power of every dog's nose, and thus disrespect his abilities.
I believe it is important to recognize that dogs do have better senses, at least in most circumstances, than we do. We must trust their nature, respect their talents, and use their natural abilities to help them learn what we want them to know. After all, we are trying our best to bring that special part of nature into a human-oriented enviroment. If we respect them for what they are, the reward for us can be a unique and rewarding relationship.
Monday, June 29, 2009
Thursday, June 25, 2009
How Costly is BSL? New Study Claims to Know
Best Friends Animal Society did some of their own calculations and determined that King County, WA could spend more than $2.5 million to enforce the law, as well as perform DNA testing, euthanasia, veterinary care, and of course handle litigations that would arise if it passed breed-specific legislation (BSL).
An article by Brenda F. Barnette, as a Special to the Times, mentions Denver as a good example of the negative numbers. In 1989, Denver banned pit bulls, but according to the Canine Research Council, there has been no difference in the number or severity of dog attacks, when compared to cities without breed bans.
Ms. Barnette writes that over the last 40 years, only 5-10% of all reported bites have been classified as "serious" regardless of whether that area had passed or enforced BSL. She goes on to promote enforcement of basic "dangerous dog" laws, which tackle the behavior of a dog rather than its breed, as well as to educate the public in basic dog bite prevention methods.
I think I like her.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/PrintStory.pl?document_id=2009370296&zsection_id=268883724&slug=guest23barnette&date=20090622
An article by Brenda F. Barnette, as a Special to the Times, mentions Denver as a good example of the negative numbers. In 1989, Denver banned pit bulls, but according to the Canine Research Council, there has been no difference in the number or severity of dog attacks, when compared to cities without breed bans.
Ms. Barnette writes that over the last 40 years, only 5-10% of all reported bites have been classified as "serious" regardless of whether that area had passed or enforced BSL. She goes on to promote enforcement of basic "dangerous dog" laws, which tackle the behavior of a dog rather than its breed, as well as to educate the public in basic dog bite prevention methods.
I think I like her.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/PrintStory.pl?document_id=2009370296&zsection_id=268883724&slug=guest23barnette&date=20090622
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Ohio Dog Owners Should Be Concerned
The following is a cross-posted (by permission) post by John Yates. If it looks too long to read, read the bullet points and consider the harm this would do. The date in question is Wed., June 24th (today).
Legislation Would Destroy Almost Every Ohio Kennel
Hearing Tomorrow - Act Now Or Lose It All
by JOHN YATES
American sporting Dog Alliance
http://www.americansportingdogalliance.orgasda@csonline.net
This report is archived at http://eaglerock814.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=47
COLUMBUS, OH – A critical committee hearing is scheduled for tomorrow (June 24, 2009) on legislation that we believe would make it impossible for anyone to raise dogs in Ohio. The House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee will take testimony on House Bill 124 beginning at 9:30 a.m. in Room 018 of the State Capitol Building. We have heard unofficial reports that testimony on another bill may push back the hearing on HB 124 until after Noon, but this cannot be confirmed officially.
We cannot be too emphatic about the devastating nature of HB 124 and its impact on people who raise dogs in Ohio. It is very radical animal rights legislation straight from the heart of the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), which is the political mouthpiece for this movement to gradually eliminate all animal ownership in America.
If dog owners do not act decisively and in large numbers, they will have only themselves to blame if this terrible legislation is passed into law. Immediate action is required to save the dogs that you love. No excuse is good enough for failing to act now.
Some people may think we are exaggerating and using scare tactics. We are not, and we will prove it in this report. First, we will summarize the major provisions in HB 124, and then we will provide a direct link to the actual text of this legislation so that people can read it for themselves and prove that everything we are saying is true.
Ohio dog owners have every reason to be scared – very scared! And they have every reason to be very angry because this legislation denies innocent dog owners the basic rights and legal processes that are guaranteed to someone charged with murder or rape.
You will no longer truly own your dogs if this legislation passes. They will become, in essence, wards of the state.
Here are some of the major provisions of HB 124 and its companion bill, Senate Bill 95:
· A Kennel Authority would be created to write regulations, administer the law and control virtually everything done by dog owners. The Authority's politically appointed Board of Directors would be heavily weighted toward animal rights activists. Only one person who raises dogs and one person representing pet stores would be on the Board. There is no legislative or judicial oversight over the decisions of this board.
· This committee would be given a free hand to design and implement all of the rules for kennel licensing, inspections and paperwork, as well as all construction, maintenance and management requirements.
· The board will require every kennel owner and "any other person" who sells even one dog to obtain a tax vendor number. You must pay sales tax for selling even one dog or puppy.
· Each applicant for any kind of kennel license will be subjected to a criminal background check by the state Attorney General.
· Every license applicant must post insurance or a bond to cover the state's cost of enforcing the law at the kennel.
· The Board is given a completely blank check to write "any other requirements and procedures" to define and enforce the law. People with animal rights beliefs will have total control over the lives of dog owners.
· Anyone who buys, offers to sell, sells or gives away nine or more dogs a year is intensely regulated and licensed as a dealer, which is called a "dog intermediary" in the legislation. Anyone who sells even one dog or puppy to a pet store also is considered a dealer.
· Anyone who raises more than nine litters of puppies a year, or has 40 puppies a year, must be licensed as a "breeding kennel" and subject to extremely intense regulation. For some breeds, only four litters a year could produce 40 puppies. A "breeding dog" is defined as any dog that is not spayed or neutered, regardless of the dog's actual purpose in a kennel.
· Anyone from out of state who sells a dog or puppy to an Ohio resident must document the entire history of the dog, and provide a veterinary health certificate. This will make it very difficult for Ohioans to obtain a dog from another state.
· Tail docking, ear cropping and dewclaw removal (or the removal of any other claw) can be done only by a veterinarian. Owners no longer could dock tails of newborn puppies, as has been standard practice for centuries. Owners also could be prosecuted if a dog accidentally rips off a claw, such as when hunting.
· Kennel owners would no longer be allowed to treat even minor ailments or injuries, possibly even including parasites, which are now defined as a disease. All treatments must be done by a veterinarian.
· No one can sell a dog at any public place, which would include field trials, dog shows and other canine gatherings. All sales must be at the kennel facility.
· The state is required to inspect "any facility…upon request of a member of the public" or a public or quasi-public official. That means that animal rights activists can demand and get state inspections of the home and property of anyone who has dogs, without making or proving any allegation of a violation, and without producing proof of any kind. This will lead to continual and frightening harassment of law-abiding dogs owners by animal rights groups, and the state must respond to all requests for inspections, even if they are obviously bogus.
· Inspectors are given absolute and incontestable power to enter and inspect "any public or private property" to see if a violation of the law has occurred. There is no requirement for a search warrant or probable cause (a warrant is an option method, but is not required). Anyone who refuses to allow an inspection, or hinders it, can be assessed for the entire cost to the state to investigate and prosecute, including wages and expenses for an unlimited number of state officials.
· Any dog may be impounded if the state has probable cause to believe any violation of the law has occurred, but probable cause is not required to presented before a court, as is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. A hearing before the state agency is set within five days, and the dogs could be permanently forfeited to face adoption or euthanasia. A dog owner cannot appeal to a local court, but can appeal only to the Environmental Division of the Franklin County Municipal Court, and the kennel owner must post a bond. The state agency thus becomes the cop, prosecutor, judge and jury.
· Civil penalties ranging up to $15,000 can be imposed administratively (with no appeal) for violations, and separate penalties can be assigned for every dog in violation for every day it is in violation. Thus, a dog owner can be destroyed financially without ever getting his or her day in court, even for minor or accidental infractions.
· The state "shall deny" a license to any person who has violated any part of the law or any rule, and that includes paperwork deficiencies, accidental mistakes and minor technical errors.
· The state "shall deny" a license to anyone who "does not have the expertise or capacity to comply" with the law or regulations. That gives the state absolute power to judge the qualifications of anyone to own a dog, and no objective standards are defined. The decision is entirely subjective. There is no appeal. This also means that most poor and working class people could be denied licensure simply because they don't have enough money to meet all of the state's insatiable demands. This is a very real issue in today's troubled economy, and Ohio is among the states hardest hit by the current deep recession.
· No puppy under 12 weeks of age can be sold unless the litter is registered with the state. This essentially creates a database of every dog in Ohio, which many dog owners think will be used someday to mandate pet sterilization or ban certain breeds of dogs.
· The law provides exacting specifications for kennel sizes, construction and temperature control, and allows the Board to create even more stringent regulations. These rules effectively prohibit a dog owner from raising puppies inside his or her own home, and also effectively ban outdoor housing in the winter for most breeds of dogs (it may exclude hunting and sled dogs, but there is some ambiguity in the language) if the water cannot be kept unfrozen 24 hours a day. The use of crates to train dogs kept in a home also is effectively banned.
· Except for dogs that are continuously confined to a kennel, any dog that is found without a collar and license tag (even inside the owner's home) can be seized, sold or killed. This would appear to include puppies, as the word "dog" is not defined.
· No person or group who is licensed as a dog rescue would be allowed to breed any dogs or raise any puppies. This would destroy the breed rescue network in Ohio, as most of the participants actually raise the breed they are helping to rescue.
· And reams of time-consuming paperwork and compliance documentations would be required, and minor omissions or errors could cause a license to be denied or revoked.
It is the belief of the American Sporting Dog Alliance that the terms of HB 124 that are outlined above will combine to force almost every kennel in Ohio to close its doors. The combination of stringent rules, unreasonable liabilities and draconian enforcement measures will either result in kennels being closed by the state, or kennel owners being scared and intimidated into quitting to avoid the probability that the state would destroy their lives.
Please do not take our word for it. We want you to read this legislation yourself and form your own conclusions.
Here is a direct link to the actual text of HB 124: http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=128_HB_124 . Please read it.
The American Sporting Dog Alliance regards this bill as an unconscionable perversion of the American concept of justice that shows utter disdain for the Bill of Rights, individual privacy or the concept of private property.
What You Can Do About It
Ohio dog owners are up against an array of powerful forces from the animal rights movement. They are well organized and well funded, and have been preparing for this legislation for many years.
To stop this legislation will require an outpouring of clear opposition from several thousand Ohio dog owners, and the time for it to happen is now.
If dog owners do not act in large numbers, there is a high probability that this terrible and destructive legislation will be passed into law.
Please be scared. Please be angry. Please be scared and angry enough to fight back as if your life depends on it – and it does.
Here is what you can do:
Contact the chairman of the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee, Rep. John Domenick (D-95) and the Minority Chair, Rep. Jeff Wagner (R-81). Faxes and written letters are the best, but this should also include a phone call or email immediately, because the hearing is tomorrow. Emails alone probably are less effective, but far better than nothing.
Here is contact information for Rep. Domenick:
Address:77 S. High St12th Floor Columbus, OH 43215-6111 Phone: (614) 466-3735 Fax: (614) 719-6995 Email: district95@ohr.state.oh.us
Here is contact information for Rep. Wegner:Address:77 S. High St10th Floor Columbus, OH 43215-6111 Phone: (614) 466-1374 Fax: (614) 719-6981 Email: district81@ohr.state.oh.us
In addition, please contact as many members of the committee that you can. Here is a link to a list of all representatives on the committee: http://www.house.state.oh.us/index.php?option=com_displaycommittees&task=2&type=Regular&committeeId=93 . Click on the name, and a page with contact information on the left side will appear.
If your own legislator is on the committee, it is urgent to contact him or her as well as the chairmen.
Even if your own representative is not on the committee, please make an effort to contact him or her as well. Most of them care deeply about your views, and need to know that large numbers of their constituents oppose HB 124.
It also would be very prudent and effective to speak directly to your representative. A group of dog owners would be very effective at meetings with legislators. Please ask your friends to help. Many legislators will be back in their own home districts at least weekly this time of the year.
Here is a list for contact information for all Ohio legislators: http://www.house.state.oh.us/index.php?option=com_displaymembers&Itemid=57 .It also would be very helpful to write letters to the editor of local newspapers, and to make sure that all of the people you know are aware of this legislation. Ask your friends to help by contacting their legislators, even if they do not own dogs. Most Ohioans will respect your right to own dogs, even if they do not own dogs themselves.If you are able to attend the hearing, please do. You can sign up to testify as well.
Also, please email this report to everyone you know. We need their help.
The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We also welcome people who work with other breeds, as legislative issues affect all of us. We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life. The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your membership, participation and support are truly essential to the success of our mission. We are funded solely by your donations in order to maintain strict independence.
Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org . Our email is asda@csonline.net .
PLEASE CROSS-POST AND FORWARD THIS REPORT TO YOUR FRIENDS
Legislation Would Destroy Almost Every Ohio Kennel
Hearing Tomorrow - Act Now Or Lose It All
by JOHN YATES
American sporting Dog Alliance
http://www.americansportingdogalliance.orgasda@csonline.net
This report is archived at http://eaglerock814.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=47
COLUMBUS, OH – A critical committee hearing is scheduled for tomorrow (June 24, 2009) on legislation that we believe would make it impossible for anyone to raise dogs in Ohio. The House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee will take testimony on House Bill 124 beginning at 9:30 a.m. in Room 018 of the State Capitol Building. We have heard unofficial reports that testimony on another bill may push back the hearing on HB 124 until after Noon, but this cannot be confirmed officially.
We cannot be too emphatic about the devastating nature of HB 124 and its impact on people who raise dogs in Ohio. It is very radical animal rights legislation straight from the heart of the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), which is the political mouthpiece for this movement to gradually eliminate all animal ownership in America.
If dog owners do not act decisively and in large numbers, they will have only themselves to blame if this terrible legislation is passed into law. Immediate action is required to save the dogs that you love. No excuse is good enough for failing to act now.
Some people may think we are exaggerating and using scare tactics. We are not, and we will prove it in this report. First, we will summarize the major provisions in HB 124, and then we will provide a direct link to the actual text of this legislation so that people can read it for themselves and prove that everything we are saying is true.
Ohio dog owners have every reason to be scared – very scared! And they have every reason to be very angry because this legislation denies innocent dog owners the basic rights and legal processes that are guaranteed to someone charged with murder or rape.
You will no longer truly own your dogs if this legislation passes. They will become, in essence, wards of the state.
Here are some of the major provisions of HB 124 and its companion bill, Senate Bill 95:
· A Kennel Authority would be created to write regulations, administer the law and control virtually everything done by dog owners. The Authority's politically appointed Board of Directors would be heavily weighted toward animal rights activists. Only one person who raises dogs and one person representing pet stores would be on the Board. There is no legislative or judicial oversight over the decisions of this board.
· This committee would be given a free hand to design and implement all of the rules for kennel licensing, inspections and paperwork, as well as all construction, maintenance and management requirements.
· The board will require every kennel owner and "any other person" who sells even one dog to obtain a tax vendor number. You must pay sales tax for selling even one dog or puppy.
· Each applicant for any kind of kennel license will be subjected to a criminal background check by the state Attorney General.
· Every license applicant must post insurance or a bond to cover the state's cost of enforcing the law at the kennel.
· The Board is given a completely blank check to write "any other requirements and procedures" to define and enforce the law. People with animal rights beliefs will have total control over the lives of dog owners.
· Anyone who buys, offers to sell, sells or gives away nine or more dogs a year is intensely regulated and licensed as a dealer, which is called a "dog intermediary" in the legislation. Anyone who sells even one dog or puppy to a pet store also is considered a dealer.
· Anyone who raises more than nine litters of puppies a year, or has 40 puppies a year, must be licensed as a "breeding kennel" and subject to extremely intense regulation. For some breeds, only four litters a year could produce 40 puppies. A "breeding dog" is defined as any dog that is not spayed or neutered, regardless of the dog's actual purpose in a kennel.
· Anyone from out of state who sells a dog or puppy to an Ohio resident must document the entire history of the dog, and provide a veterinary health certificate. This will make it very difficult for Ohioans to obtain a dog from another state.
· Tail docking, ear cropping and dewclaw removal (or the removal of any other claw) can be done only by a veterinarian. Owners no longer could dock tails of newborn puppies, as has been standard practice for centuries. Owners also could be prosecuted if a dog accidentally rips off a claw, such as when hunting.
· Kennel owners would no longer be allowed to treat even minor ailments or injuries, possibly even including parasites, which are now defined as a disease. All treatments must be done by a veterinarian.
· No one can sell a dog at any public place, which would include field trials, dog shows and other canine gatherings. All sales must be at the kennel facility.
· The state is required to inspect "any facility…upon request of a member of the public" or a public or quasi-public official. That means that animal rights activists can demand and get state inspections of the home and property of anyone who has dogs, without making or proving any allegation of a violation, and without producing proof of any kind. This will lead to continual and frightening harassment of law-abiding dogs owners by animal rights groups, and the state must respond to all requests for inspections, even if they are obviously bogus.
· Inspectors are given absolute and incontestable power to enter and inspect "any public or private property" to see if a violation of the law has occurred. There is no requirement for a search warrant or probable cause (a warrant is an option method, but is not required). Anyone who refuses to allow an inspection, or hinders it, can be assessed for the entire cost to the state to investigate and prosecute, including wages and expenses for an unlimited number of state officials.
· Any dog may be impounded if the state has probable cause to believe any violation of the law has occurred, but probable cause is not required to presented before a court, as is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. A hearing before the state agency is set within five days, and the dogs could be permanently forfeited to face adoption or euthanasia. A dog owner cannot appeal to a local court, but can appeal only to the Environmental Division of the Franklin County Municipal Court, and the kennel owner must post a bond. The state agency thus becomes the cop, prosecutor, judge and jury.
· Civil penalties ranging up to $15,000 can be imposed administratively (with no appeal) for violations, and separate penalties can be assigned for every dog in violation for every day it is in violation. Thus, a dog owner can be destroyed financially without ever getting his or her day in court, even for minor or accidental infractions.
· The state "shall deny" a license to any person who has violated any part of the law or any rule, and that includes paperwork deficiencies, accidental mistakes and minor technical errors.
· The state "shall deny" a license to anyone who "does not have the expertise or capacity to comply" with the law or regulations. That gives the state absolute power to judge the qualifications of anyone to own a dog, and no objective standards are defined. The decision is entirely subjective. There is no appeal. This also means that most poor and working class people could be denied licensure simply because they don't have enough money to meet all of the state's insatiable demands. This is a very real issue in today's troubled economy, and Ohio is among the states hardest hit by the current deep recession.
· No puppy under 12 weeks of age can be sold unless the litter is registered with the state. This essentially creates a database of every dog in Ohio, which many dog owners think will be used someday to mandate pet sterilization or ban certain breeds of dogs.
· The law provides exacting specifications for kennel sizes, construction and temperature control, and allows the Board to create even more stringent regulations. These rules effectively prohibit a dog owner from raising puppies inside his or her own home, and also effectively ban outdoor housing in the winter for most breeds of dogs (it may exclude hunting and sled dogs, but there is some ambiguity in the language) if the water cannot be kept unfrozen 24 hours a day. The use of crates to train dogs kept in a home also is effectively banned.
· Except for dogs that are continuously confined to a kennel, any dog that is found without a collar and license tag (even inside the owner's home) can be seized, sold or killed. This would appear to include puppies, as the word "dog" is not defined.
· No person or group who is licensed as a dog rescue would be allowed to breed any dogs or raise any puppies. This would destroy the breed rescue network in Ohio, as most of the participants actually raise the breed they are helping to rescue.
· And reams of time-consuming paperwork and compliance documentations would be required, and minor omissions or errors could cause a license to be denied or revoked.
It is the belief of the American Sporting Dog Alliance that the terms of HB 124 that are outlined above will combine to force almost every kennel in Ohio to close its doors. The combination of stringent rules, unreasonable liabilities and draconian enforcement measures will either result in kennels being closed by the state, or kennel owners being scared and intimidated into quitting to avoid the probability that the state would destroy their lives.
Please do not take our word for it. We want you to read this legislation yourself and form your own conclusions.
Here is a direct link to the actual text of HB 124: http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=128_HB_124 . Please read it.
The American Sporting Dog Alliance regards this bill as an unconscionable perversion of the American concept of justice that shows utter disdain for the Bill of Rights, individual privacy or the concept of private property.
What You Can Do About It
Ohio dog owners are up against an array of powerful forces from the animal rights movement. They are well organized and well funded, and have been preparing for this legislation for many years.
To stop this legislation will require an outpouring of clear opposition from several thousand Ohio dog owners, and the time for it to happen is now.
If dog owners do not act in large numbers, there is a high probability that this terrible and destructive legislation will be passed into law.
Please be scared. Please be angry. Please be scared and angry enough to fight back as if your life depends on it – and it does.
Here is what you can do:
Contact the chairman of the House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee, Rep. John Domenick (D-95) and the Minority Chair, Rep. Jeff Wagner (R-81). Faxes and written letters are the best, but this should also include a phone call or email immediately, because the hearing is tomorrow. Emails alone probably are less effective, but far better than nothing.
Here is contact information for Rep. Domenick:
Address:77 S. High St12th Floor Columbus, OH 43215-6111 Phone: (614) 466-3735 Fax: (614) 719-6995 Email: district95@ohr.state.oh.us
Here is contact information for Rep. Wegner:Address:77 S. High St10th Floor Columbus, OH 43215-6111 Phone: (614) 466-1374 Fax: (614) 719-6981 Email: district81@ohr.state.oh.us
In addition, please contact as many members of the committee that you can. Here is a link to a list of all representatives on the committee: http://www.house.state.oh.us/index.php?option=com_displaycommittees&task=2&type=Regular&committeeId=93 . Click on the name, and a page with contact information on the left side will appear.
If your own legislator is on the committee, it is urgent to contact him or her as well as the chairmen.
Even if your own representative is not on the committee, please make an effort to contact him or her as well. Most of them care deeply about your views, and need to know that large numbers of their constituents oppose HB 124.
It also would be very prudent and effective to speak directly to your representative. A group of dog owners would be very effective at meetings with legislators. Please ask your friends to help. Many legislators will be back in their own home districts at least weekly this time of the year.
Here is a list for contact information for all Ohio legislators: http://www.house.state.oh.us/index.php?option=com_displaymembers&Itemid=57 .It also would be very helpful to write letters to the editor of local newspapers, and to make sure that all of the people you know are aware of this legislation. Ask your friends to help by contacting their legislators, even if they do not own dogs. Most Ohioans will respect your right to own dogs, even if they do not own dogs themselves.If you are able to attend the hearing, please do. You can sign up to testify as well.
Also, please email this report to everyone you know. We need their help.
The American Sporting Dog Alliance represents owners, breeders and professionals who work with breeds of dogs that are used for hunting. We also welcome people who work with other breeds, as legislative issues affect all of us. We are a grassroots movement working to protect the rights of dog owners, and to assure that the traditional relationships between dogs and humans maintains its rightful place in American society and life. The American Sporting Dog Alliance also needs your help so that we can continue to work to protect the rights of dog owners. Your membership, participation and support are truly essential to the success of our mission. We are funded solely by your donations in order to maintain strict independence.
Please visit us on the web at http://www.americansportingdogalliance.org . Our email is asda@csonline.net .
PLEASE CROSS-POST AND FORWARD THIS REPORT TO YOUR FRIENDS
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Thoughts on Obedience Competition and the Pet Dog
This is a bit long and sometimes philosophical. Oh well.
So here's the deal: competition is a learning experience. I don't care what you think about the presence or absence of fun, scores, awards, titles, competition, nerves, or expenses. The fact remains that one who enters an obedience competition will learn something new about their handling skills, their dog, and their training.
I have more goals than one. But at this point, I really don't care about placements or awards. Those are just welcome additions for the most pleasant experiences. I am interested in taking advantage of the opportunity for an independent judge to help me learn about training and its results. That's what it is mostly all about for me. I recognize that my perspective may change somewhat with time.
I should add that I am interested in legs and titles, because it reflects on my ability to bring my dog through that point in training in which the dog can succeed consistently. I wish to create an obedient dog in home and in public. This, for me, is the end goal for myself and my students. I am somewhat willing to be content regardless of awards won in the ring. However, in the interest of really having a deeper understanding and appreciation for the training, I must take this extra step.
What I have learned is that my dog does not do well when under pressure. So this is the concept I must learn more about. I must decide how to incorporate new techniques into my regimen in order to conquer this issue. But the important thing to note is that WITHOUT THE TEST, I WOULD NOT KNOW ABOUT THE PROBLEM. Who wants to wait until an emergency of some type develops to find out that the dog may not be reliable under certain circumstances?
I usually get up earlier than I ever care to, drive a few hours one way by myself and wait hours before my turn in the ring. It costs me in time, money, and energy to compete. It takes away from other things sometimes. It means a risk to ego and reputation. It means facing the possibility that I may do something wrong or not do something right, and do all of this in front of many other people, some strangers and some friends. I guarantee you that much of this is absolutely no fun and plenty of stress, certainly for me and sometimes for the dog. Oh, the horror!
But the benefits at the end of the day are worth it. I meet other competitors, who sometimes give me lots of new ideas. We have some interesting discussions about ring issues and handler errors and club politics, etc. I always learn some do's and don't's by watching other competitors and talking with others about the rules and how to avoid some common (or rare) pitfalls in training or handling issues.
I learn something about my own thought process and that of my dog's. That's always nice.
At the end of the day, nobody else really cares as much about how well or poorly I did in the ring as I do. But nobody else benefits from my experience as much as I do, either. So I can swallow the bitter pill of failure when it happens and look forward to learning more by working toward the next success.
My goals with competing may be different from others. But it has occurred to me that what is most important to me is what my dog does on a daily basis at home and in public. My interest in training is simply to ensure that our relationship and daily interactions are the best that they can be, and that I inspire my students to do the same. Competing is simply a way to reach a little higher for that goal, and sometimes raise the goal while I'm at it. Competition success is never the end goal for me-- why should it ever be? Owning an obedient, reliable dog is my end goal. My training should reflect that, and competition is just a brief and occasional way to measure our progress.
What I have realized is that the portion of time I spend each year in the ring is pretty insignificant compared to the time I spend with my dog everywhere else. In fact, I just did some figuring. I've probably spent just about one and one-half hours or less in the competition ring with my dog since we started two years ago. I figure that's a small price to pay for the benefits obtained in the rest of my time.
So here's the deal: competition is a learning experience. I don't care what you think about the presence or absence of fun, scores, awards, titles, competition, nerves, or expenses. The fact remains that one who enters an obedience competition will learn something new about their handling skills, their dog, and their training.
I have more goals than one. But at this point, I really don't care about placements or awards. Those are just welcome additions for the most pleasant experiences. I am interested in taking advantage of the opportunity for an independent judge to help me learn about training and its results. That's what it is mostly all about for me. I recognize that my perspective may change somewhat with time.
I should add that I am interested in legs and titles, because it reflects on my ability to bring my dog through that point in training in which the dog can succeed consistently. I wish to create an obedient dog in home and in public. This, for me, is the end goal for myself and my students. I am somewhat willing to be content regardless of awards won in the ring. However, in the interest of really having a deeper understanding and appreciation for the training, I must take this extra step.
What I have learned is that my dog does not do well when under pressure. So this is the concept I must learn more about. I must decide how to incorporate new techniques into my regimen in order to conquer this issue. But the important thing to note is that WITHOUT THE TEST, I WOULD NOT KNOW ABOUT THE PROBLEM. Who wants to wait until an emergency of some type develops to find out that the dog may not be reliable under certain circumstances?
I usually get up earlier than I ever care to, drive a few hours one way by myself and wait hours before my turn in the ring. It costs me in time, money, and energy to compete. It takes away from other things sometimes. It means a risk to ego and reputation. It means facing the possibility that I may do something wrong or not do something right, and do all of this in front of many other people, some strangers and some friends. I guarantee you that much of this is absolutely no fun and plenty of stress, certainly for me and sometimes for the dog. Oh, the horror!
But the benefits at the end of the day are worth it. I meet other competitors, who sometimes give me lots of new ideas. We have some interesting discussions about ring issues and handler errors and club politics, etc. I always learn some do's and don't's by watching other competitors and talking with others about the rules and how to avoid some common (or rare) pitfalls in training or handling issues.
I learn something about my own thought process and that of my dog's. That's always nice.
At the end of the day, nobody else really cares as much about how well or poorly I did in the ring as I do. But nobody else benefits from my experience as much as I do, either. So I can swallow the bitter pill of failure when it happens and look forward to learning more by working toward the next success.
My goals with competing may be different from others. But it has occurred to me that what is most important to me is what my dog does on a daily basis at home and in public. My interest in training is simply to ensure that our relationship and daily interactions are the best that they can be, and that I inspire my students to do the same. Competing is simply a way to reach a little higher for that goal, and sometimes raise the goal while I'm at it. Competition success is never the end goal for me-- why should it ever be? Owning an obedient, reliable dog is my end goal. My training should reflect that, and competition is just a brief and occasional way to measure our progress.
What I have realized is that the portion of time I spend each year in the ring is pretty insignificant compared to the time I spend with my dog everywhere else. In fact, I just did some figuring. I've probably spent just about one and one-half hours or less in the competition ring with my dog since we started two years ago. I figure that's a small price to pay for the benefits obtained in the rest of my time.
Billboards Across the Country to Educate Animal Lovers
This has been cross-posted for the benefit of our readers.
Bill Boards across the country!
www.exposeanimalrights.com
Bucks for Billboards is the creation of long-time Southern California Irish Setter enthusiast, Kathy Grayson,with the support of Marion Bradshaw. They have taken a great idea from concept to product and raised the money necessary to buy and place the first 100 signs in the LA area.
Bravo! This is an amazing accomplishment. We are thrilled by their tremendous achievement and honored that they have asked us to carry their idea forward across the nation. So, with their goodwill and your support, NAIA has begun actively promoting Bucks for Billboards to make it a national success. Please help us by donating and by writing us with your ideas for a sign campaign in your state so we can fulfill our pledge to educate the public about the critical difference between animal welfare and animal rights extremism.Learn more about the campaign and donate to Bucks for Billboards now!
More information at the link above.
Bill Boards across the country!
www.exposeanimalrights.com
Bucks for Billboards is the creation of long-time Southern California Irish Setter enthusiast, Kathy Grayson,with the support of Marion Bradshaw. They have taken a great idea from concept to product and raised the money necessary to buy and place the first 100 signs in the LA area.
Bravo! This is an amazing accomplishment. We are thrilled by their tremendous achievement and honored that they have asked us to carry their idea forward across the nation. So, with their goodwill and your support, NAIA has begun actively promoting Bucks for Billboards to make it a national success. Please help us by donating and by writing us with your ideas for a sign campaign in your state so we can fulfill our pledge to educate the public about the critical difference between animal welfare and animal rights extremism.Learn more about the campaign and donate to Bucks for Billboards now!
More information at the link above.
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Update on the HSUS Expose Video, Transcript Links
The PetPac copy of the transcript of the broadcast, including the statement that PetPac has been told to take the transcript down:http://www.petpac.net/news/headlines/story_exposing_hsus_buried_read_transcript/
The high definition (55 meg) version on Vidoosh, an Iranian video sharing site:http://www.vidoosh.tv/play.php?vid=4360
A smaller version (9 megs) in Windows media format (.WMV) on USENDIT:https://rcpt.yousendit.com/692013900/57c2dc3f3c9fe7230654e2004a6bc755
A still smaller version (8 megs) in .MOV format. This is the quickest of all to view if you have only dial up service. http://tinyurl.com/opf2zg
Thank you, Walt, for sharing these links!
The high definition (55 meg) version on Vidoosh, an Iranian video sharing site:http://www.vidoosh.tv/play.php?vid=4360
A smaller version (9 megs) in Windows media format (.WMV) on USENDIT:https://rcpt.yousendit.com/692013900/57c2dc3f3c9fe7230654e2004a6bc755
A still smaller version (8 megs) in .MOV format. This is the quickest of all to view if you have only dial up service. http://tinyurl.com/opf2zg
Thank you, Walt, for sharing these links!
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
An oops from the last post...
Please don't call Ms Hunley's office, as suggested below. She is in the Criminal Division. She suggested calls should go to the Public Protection Office at 225-326-6400.
A polite thank-you to the person who provided this information.
A polite thank-you to the person who provided this information.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
